=== ORIGINAL JSON ===
{
    "paper_id": "review_20251127_215209",
    "sections_checked": ["claims", "references", "data", "figures_tables", "quotes", "entities", "urls_datasets", "ethics_compliance", "consistency"],
    "claims": [
        {
            "claim_id": "C01",
            "claim_text": "The study analyzes 372,000 tweets from the Israel–Palestine Conflict Tweets Dataset spanning October 2023 to March 2024.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Dataset named but no source citation provided in text. Internal consistency of N=372k."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C02",
            "claim_text": "The dataset was sourced from Kaggle and represents publicly available digital testimony.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 0,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 2.0,
            "verdict": "unreliable",
            "notes": "No citation to Kaggle dataset in references. Source unverifiable."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C03",
            "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian narratives achieve higher moral credibility scores (0.74 versus 0.59).",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Internal table shows 0.74 vs 0.59. No external source for MCI definition/validation."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C04",
            "claim_text": "Intercoder reliability achieved κ = 0.84.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Value reported in text. No methodological citation for reliability standards."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C05",
            "claim_text": "Quantitative analysis employed Python libraries including pandas, nltk, scikit-learn, and matplotlib.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Standard tool names, internally consistent. No external citation needed."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C06",
            "claim_text": "Sentiment analysis utilized the VADER model adapted for social media context.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "VADER is a known model. Method description internally consistent."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C07",
            "claim_text": "Topic modeling implemented Latent Dirichlet Allocation with a ten-topic solution.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "LDA is standard. Internal consistency with 10 topics in Table 5."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C08",
            "claim_text": "Correlation analysis used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Standard statistical method. Internally consistent."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C09",
            "claim_text": "English language tweets constitute 60% of the dataset, Arabic 25%, and Hebrew 10%.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Percentages sum to 95%. Internal data, no source citation."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C10",
            "claim_text": "Geographic distribution shows 48% of tweets originate from the Middle East region.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Internal data, no source. Consistent with Table 2 totals."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C11",
            "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian mean sentiment is -0.32; Pro-Israeli is 0.14.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Values from Table 1. No external validation of sentiment scoring."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C12",
            "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian likes per tweet mean is 823; Pro-Israeli is 511.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Values from Table 3. No source for raw engagement data."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C13",
            "claim_text": "Hashtag #FreePalestine appears with 22.4% frequency.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Value from Table 4. No external dataset verification."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C14",
            "claim_text": "The emotion polarity index shows sadness at 38.2% for pro-Palestinian content.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Value from Table 8. No citation for emotion classification method."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C15",
            "claim_text": "The study draws on Fricker’s concept of epistemic injustice.",
            "supporting_refs": ["[4]"],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 2,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 2,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 2,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 10.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Reference [4] matches Fricker 2007. Concept correctly attributed."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C16",
            "claim_text": "The study utilizes Margalit’s notion of the moral witness.",
            "supporting_refs": ["[6]"],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 2,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 2,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 2,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 10.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Reference [6] matches Margalit 2002. Concept correctly attributed."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C17",
            "claim_text": "The dataset license is CC BY-NC 4.0.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1
            },
            "final_fact_score": 6.0,
            "verdict": "needs_human_review",
            "notes": "Stated in Data Statement but no source link to verify license."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C18",
            "claim_text": "The research addresses digital representation of human suffering during violent conflict.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 1,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 10.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "General research focus statement. Thematic, not a specific factual claim."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C19",
            "claim_text": "The study employs a concurrent mixed-methods design.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Methodological description internally consistent."
        },
        {
            "claim_id": "C20",
            "claim_text": "No funding agency, political organization, or governmental body influenced the study.",
            "supporting_refs": [],
            "contradicting_refs": [],
            "criteria_scores": {
                "reference_authenticity": 0,
                "claim_reference_alignment": 0,
                "data_consistency": 2,
                "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0,
                "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2
            },
            "final_fact_score": 8.0,
            "verdict": "reliable",
            "notes": "Declaration in Disclosure Statement. Unverifiable but internally stated."
        }
    ],
    "reference_audit": {
        "total_refs": 8,
        "valid_metadata_count": 8,
        "invalid_or_placeholder_count": 0,
        "duplicate_count": 0,
        "suspicious_items": []
    },
    "data_audit": {
        "numeric_items_checked": 50,
        "mismatches": ["Language percentages sum to 95%, not 100% (60+25+10=95).", "Table 2 regional percentages for Pro-Palestinian column sum to 100% (71.3+15.5+7.8+5.4=100), but Pro-Israeli column sums to 100% (18.2+47.9+22.4+11.5=100). Text says 48% Middle East overall, but table shows disaggregated narrative alignment."],
        "p_value_anomalies": ["Table 6 shows p<0.01, p<0.001, p<0.05. Formatting uses italics but values are plausible."],
        "range_unit_issues": ["Sentiment scores in Table 1 have SD ~0.5, range -1 to +1 plausible. No units for engagement metrics in Table 3."]
    },
    "figures_tables_audit": {
        "items_checked": 10,
        "caption_data_mismatch": [],
        "unlabeled_axes_or_missing_units": ["Tables lack explicit units for metrics (e.g., Likes per tweet, percentages)."],
        "reused_or_referenced_without_source": []
    },
    "quotes_audit": {
        "quotes_checked": 0,
        "exact_match_count": 0,
        "paraphrase_fidelity_flags": []
    },
    "entity_audit": {
        "journals_verified": 5,
        "authors_verified": 8,
        "orgs_verified": 0,
        "nonexistent_or_ambiguous_entities": []
    },
    "urls_datasets_audit": {
        "dois_present": 0,
        "urls_present": 0,
        "dataset_citations_present": 1,
        "missing_provenance_or_license": ["Dataset 'Israel–Palestine Conflict Tweets Dataset' cited as from Kaggle via Mehyar Mlaweh (2024) but no URL/DOI provided to verify existence, license, or version."]
    },
    "ethics_compliance_audit": {
        "mentions_irb_or_ethics": true,
        "mentions_consent": false,
        "mentions_data_protection": true,
        "missing_expected_items": ["Uses public social media data but no mention of platform Terms of Service compliance or ethical guidelines for social media research."]
    },
    "consistency_audit": {
        "intra_text_conflicts": ["Abstract says '372,000 tweets', Section 5.2 says '372,000 tweets' – consistent. Table 7 monthly volumes sum to 372,000 (110432+89220+66508+54319+32441+19080=372,000)."],
        "temporal_jurisdiction_issues": []
    }

=== REPAIRED JSON ===
{"paper_id": "review_20251127_215209", "sections_checked": ["claims", "references", "data", "figures_tables", "quotes", "entities", "urls_datasets", "ethics_compliance", "consistency"], "claims": [{"claim_id": "C01", "claim_text": "The study analyzes 372,000 tweets from the Israel\u2013Palestine Conflict Tweets Dataset spanning October 2023 to March 2024.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Dataset named but no source citation provided in text. Internal consistency of N=372k."}, {"claim_id": "C02", "claim_text": "The dataset was sourced from Kaggle and represents publicly available digital testimony.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 0, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 2.0, "verdict": "unreliable", "notes": "No citation to Kaggle dataset in references. Source unverifiable."}, {"claim_id": "C03", "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian narratives achieve higher moral credibility scores (0.74 versus 0.59).", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Internal table shows 0.74 vs 0.59. No external source for MCI definition/validation."}, {"claim_id": "C04", "claim_text": "Intercoder reliability achieved \u03ba = 0.84.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Value reported in text. No methodological citation for reliability standards."}, {"claim_id": "C05", "claim_text": "Quantitative analysis employed Python libraries including pandas, nltk, scikit-learn, and matplotlib.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Standard tool names, internally consistent. No external citation needed."}, {"claim_id": "C06", "claim_text": "Sentiment analysis utilized the VADER model adapted for social media context.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "VADER is a known model. Method description internally consistent."}, {"claim_id": "C07", "claim_text": "Topic modeling implemented Latent Dirichlet Allocation with a ten-topic solution.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "LDA is standard. Internal consistency with 10 topics in Table 5."}, {"claim_id": "C08", "claim_text": "Correlation analysis used Spearman\u2019s rank correlation coefficient.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Standard statistical method. Internally consistent."}, {"claim_id": "C09", "claim_text": "English language tweets constitute 60% of the dataset, Arabic 25%, and Hebrew 10%.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Percentages sum to 95%. Internal data, no source citation."}, {"claim_id": "C10", "claim_text": "Geographic distribution shows 48% of tweets originate from the Middle East region.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Internal data, no source. Consistent with Table 2 totals."}, {"claim_id": "C11", "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian mean sentiment is -0.32; Pro-Israeli is 0.14.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Values from Table 1. No external validation of sentiment scoring."}, {"claim_id": "C12", "claim_text": "Pro-Palestinian likes per tweet mean is 823; Pro-Israeli is 511.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Values from Table 3. No source for raw engagement data."}, {"claim_id": "C13", "claim_text": "Hashtag #FreePalestine appears with 22.4% frequency.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Value from Table 4. No external dataset verification."}, {"claim_id": "C14", "claim_text": "The emotion polarity index shows sadness at 38.2% for pro-Palestinian content.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Value from Table 8. No citation for emotion classification method."}, {"claim_id": "C15", "claim_text": "The study draws on Fricker\u2019s concept of epistemic injustice.", "supporting_refs": ["[4]"], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 2, "claim_reference_alignment": 2, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 2, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 10.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Reference [4] matches Fricker 2007. Concept correctly attributed."}, {"claim_id": "C16", "claim_text": "The study utilizes Margalit\u2019s notion of the moral witness.", "supporting_refs": ["[6]"], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 2, "claim_reference_alignment": 2, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 2, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 10.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Reference [6] matches Margalit 2002. Concept correctly attributed."}, {"claim_id": "C17", "claim_text": "The dataset license is CC BY-NC 4.0.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 1}, "final_fact_score": 6.0, "verdict": "needs_human_review", "notes": "Stated in Data Statement but no source link to verify license."}, {"claim_id": "C18", "claim_text": "The research addresses digital representation of human suffering during violent conflict.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 1, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 10.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "General research focus statement. Thematic, not a specific factual claim."}, {"claim_id": "C19", "claim_text": "The study employs a concurrent mixed-methods design.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Methodological description internally consistent."}, {"claim_id": "C20", "claim_text": "No funding agency, political organization, or governmental body influenced the study.", "supporting_refs": [], "contradicting_refs": [], "criteria_scores": {"reference_authenticity": 0, "claim_reference_alignment": 0, "data_consistency": 2, "scientific_consensus_or_authority": 0, "hallucination_fabrication_check": 2}, "final_fact_score": 8.0, "verdict": "reliable", "notes": "Declaration in Disclosure Statement. Unverifiable but internally stated."}], "reference_audit": {"total_refs": 8, "valid_metadata_count": 8, "invalid_or_placeholder_count": 0, "duplicate_count": 0, "suspicious_items": []}, "data_audit": {"numeric_items_checked": 50, "mismatches": ["Language percentages sum to 95%, not 100% (60+25+10=95).", "Table 2 regional percentages for Pro-Palestinian column sum to 100% (71.3+15.5+7.8+5.4=100), but Pro-Israeli column sums to 100% (18.2+47.9+22.4+11.5=100). Text says 48% Middle East overall, but table shows disaggregated narrative alignment."], "p_value_anomalies": ["Table 6 shows p<0.01, p<0.001, p<0.05. Formatting uses italics but values are plausible."], "range_unit_issues": ["Sentiment scores in Table 1 have SD ~0.5, range -1 to +1 plausible. No units for engagement metrics in Table 3."]}, "figures_tables_audit": {"items_checked": 10, "caption_data_mismatch": [], "unlabeled_axes_or_missing_units": ["Tables lack explicit units for metrics (e.g., Likes per tweet, percentages)."], "reused_or_referenced_without_source": []}, "quotes_audit": {"quotes_checked": 0, "exact_match_count": 0, "paraphrase_fidelity_flags": []}, "entity_audit": {"journals_verified": 5, "authors_verified": 8, "orgs_verified": 0, "nonexistent_or_ambiguous_entities": []}, "urls_datasets_audit": {"dois_present": 0, "urls_present": 0, "dataset_citations_present": 1, "missing_provenance_or_license": ["Dataset 'Israel\u2013Palestine Conflict Tweets Dataset' cited as from Kaggle via Mehyar Mlaweh (2024) but no URL/DOI provided to verify existence, license, or version."]}, "ethics_compliance_audit": {"mentions_irb_or_ethics": true, "mentions_consent": false, "mentions_data_protection": true, "missing_expected_items": ["Uses public social media data but no mention of platform Terms of Service compliance or ethical guidelines for social media research."]}, "consistency_audit": {"intra_text_conflicts": ["Abstract says '372,000 tweets', Section 5.2 says '372,000 tweets' \u2013 consistent. Table 7 monthly volumes sum to 372,000 (110432+89220+66508+54319+32441+19080=372,000)."], "temporal_jurisdiction_issues": []}}